The Fluff Index
Are guitar magazine reviews trustworthy?
The cons box exhibit.
“Weird placement of the MIDI ports. / The spring settings could be better.”
The full scorecard ↗“High levels of sag can make precision players sound like they kinda suck—but in an absolutely awesome way!”
The full scorecard ↗“Might not have enough bells and whistles for some first-generation Archon users.”
The full scorecard ↗“Your guitar player will be jealous.”
The full scorecard ↗“Blinding white LED almost makes controls practically unreadable.”
The full scorecard ↗“The indicator lights are hard to see past your foot. / Takes up a fair amount of pedalboard real estate.”
The full scorecard ↗“Some users less experienced with controlling the filter cutoffs and LFOs found in synthesizers may find the Towers' super-long decay times and synth-like sonics difficult to reign in.”
The full scorecard ↗“Central controls are very close together.”
The full scorecard ↗“Lacks features like a treadle and MIDI capability that bigger pitch shifters provide.”
The full scorecard ↗“Factory setup needed a tweak / It's not the most versatile of guitars”
The full scorecard ↗“Nothing, but the price may deter some users”
The full scorecard ↗“No effects loop or attenuation / There's a lot of competition at this price point”
The full scorecard ↗“Although the tremolo sounds good its speed can be finicky to dial in / A 2x12 and 4x12 cab preset would have been nice”
The full scorecard ↗